Component-based UI is all the rage these days. Did you know that the web has its own native component module that doesn't require the use of any libraries? True story! You can write, publish, and reuse single-file components that will work in any* good browser and in any framework (if that's your bag).
In our last post, we learned about the Polymer library and its unique approach to data-binding and app composition.
Today we'll implement <lit-lazy-image>
using the LitElement
base class.
Compared to Polymer, LitElement
takes a fundamentally different approach to
templating, one which is much more congruent to the reactive style of
programming which has become so widespread in front-end in the last few years.
With one-way data flow, a declarative syntax for binding data and event
listeners, and a
standards-based
approach to efficient DOM updates,
LitElement
s are performant and a pleasure to write.
lit-html
LitElement
<lit-lazy-image>
- Attributes and Properties
LitElement
Lifecycle- Factoring Apps with
LitElement
But before we dive in, let's take a minute to explore the lit-html
library,
which is the foundation of LitElement
lit-html
lit-html
is a new library (currently in pre-release) by Justin Fagnani, an
engineer at Google. You use it to write dynamic and expressive DOM templates in
JavaScript. If you've worked with React's JSX, you've doubtless written and
composed similar templates. Unlike JSX, lit-html
leverages the browser's
built-in HTML parser, and
standards like the
<template>
element and tagged template
literals
to efficiently update the DOM without any "Virtual DOM" overhead.
Functional UI
With lit-html
templates, we're entering the world of functional programming
in JavaScript. We'll be using terms like 'pure' and 'impure' functions a lot in
this article, so for an introduction or refresher on functional concepts, check
out Brian Lonsdorf's canonical Mostly Adequate Guide to Functional
Programming, but
for our purposes we'll be interested in a few basic concepts:
- Pure Functions: Functions that take an input and return an output without referencing or affecting any other data.
- Impure Functions: Functions that produce side effects.
- Side Effects: Anything that happens asides from immediately computing
some result from some input, e.g. writing to the
console.log
or thedocument
, or accessing global variables.
So when we say "UI as a function of data", we mean that without having to use anything other than our data, we can compute a piece of UI.
import { html, render } from 'lit-html';
/* lit-html: UI as a pure function of data */
const view = ({ content, title }) =>
html`<h1>${title}</h1>${content}`;
/* Compose templates from other templates */
const title = 'View as a Pure Function of Data';
const content = html`
<p>Composable templates are flexible and powerful. They let you define
complex views from simple building blocks.</p>
<p>Using composition, you can hide implementation details of your
app. This makes your work easier to test, reason about, and debug.</p>`;
/* Everything up to now has been pure. By calling `render`,
* we pull the trigger on the impure part of our app and
* actually write our view to the screen. */
render(view({ content, title }), document.body);
The html
function (template literal tags are just functions) returns a
special type called a TemplateResult
, which knows about its static parts and
its dynamic parts (or interpolated expressions i.e. the changing
${someExpression}
parts) in its template literals. The render
function
takes a TemplateResult
along with a containing node to dynamically update the
DOM. By storing the locations in DOM that might react to changing values of
expressions in templates, lit-html
can efficiently update those parts of the
DOM each render call, without having to re-render the whole tree.
This is similar enough in practice to React's JSX, but let's take a step back to appreciate the differences, so we can make more informed choices. Here is a non-exhaustive list of all the web standards mentioned or alluded to In the previous paragraph:
- Template
Literals
- JavaScript Strings with powerful interpolation features
- Tagged Template
Literals
- Specially-written functions that act specifically on Template Literals
- Template Tags Knowing their Static and Dynamic
Parts
This isn't a bespoke library feature,
lit-html
leverages the standards - WeakMap to hold the map of template parts to their associated Nodes
Since lit-html
rests exclusively on standards, it runs directly in the
browser. It doesn't require any build step, compilation, transforms, or
anything like that. In fact I've factored many apps with lit-html using nothing
but .js
files - just hit save and refresh!
So, the lit-html
library's raison d'être is to use
established, browser-native web standards to let developers write dynamic and
expressive HTML-in-JS while handling efficient DOM updates behind the scenes.
For the scoop on that, let's hear it right from the horse' mouth:
Data Binding
In lit-html
templates, you can insert JavaScript expressions in place of any
node, or as the value of any attribute. Let's imagine a hypothetical product
page where we want to fetch a collection of product objects from our API, then
output an HTML template for each.
We can interpolate attribute values with any data we want:
const star = value => html`
<meter class="star-rating"
min="0" max="5"
value="${value}"
></meter>`;
We can declaratively define event listeners by passing in a function with a
special @event-type
binding syntax. We'll imagine an example that uses some
analytics
function (presumably imported from elsewhere) to report when our
product images load on screen.
const lazyThumbnail = ({ id, alt, thumbnail }) => html`
<lazy-image
src="${`https://product-cdn.awesomeshop.com/images/${thumbnail}`}"
alt="${alt}"
@loaded-changed="${event => analytics('thumbnail-viewed', { event, id })}"
></lazy-image>`;
For more control over the listener behaviour, we could pass in a special listener descriptor object. This is also more memory-efficient since it doesn't create a new lambda (i.e. anonymous arrow function) for each render:
const listener = {
handleEvent: event =>
analytics('thumbnail-viewed', {
event, id: event.target.dataset.productId
}),
passive: true,
once: true,
};
const lazyThumbnail = ({ id }) => html`
<lazy-image
data-product-id="${id}"
@loaded-changed="${listener}"
></lazy-image>`;
If we wanted to bind to an element's DOM properties instead of it's HTML
attributes, we can use the .property
binding syntax.
html`<img .src="${srcProperty}"/>`;
Note that unlike expensive attribute updates which are guarded to only run when the value actually changes, property assignments happen on each render, whether or not the value has changed. So be careful of calling setters with side effects.
We can also un/set boolean attributes with the special ?attribute
syntax:
const stockBadge = ({ inventory }) => html`
<aside class="badge" ?hidden="${inventory > 0}">
Out of stock!
</aside>`;
In that way, we created a stockBadge
template which displays an 'Out of
Stock!' message when the inventory is low, a lazyThumbnail
badge which
lazy-loads the product image and notifies our analytics service when it appears
on screen, and a star
template which displays a special star-rating via the
<meter>
built-in element.
Now we can compose our product template together:
const product = ({ id, rating, thumbnail, alt, url, inventory }) => html`
<article class="product" data-product-id="${id}">
${stockBadge({ inventory })}
${lazyThumbnail({ id, alt, thumbnail })}
${star(rating)}
<a class="btn-link" href="${url}">Read More</a>
</article>`;
With all that in place, generating an entire page's worth of TemplateResult
s
would be straightforward:
const productPage = products => products.map(product);
Then, in the impure part of our app, we'd brave the elements to fetch and render our data.
const handleAsJson = response => response.json();
const renderToProductContainer = templateResult =>
render(templateResult, document.getElementById('products'))
fetch('/api/products?page=1') // Fetch the array of products
.then(handleAsJson) // Parse the response as JSON
.then(productPage) // Map `product` over the array,
// converting it to an array of TemplateResults.
.then(renderToProductContainer) // Render the templates to the DOM.
Directives
lit-html
comes with a variety of template helper functions called
directives. They are meant to be called inside of a template definition.
They interact with the internal lit-html
APIs that compute TemplateResults
, usually to improve
rendering performance.
import { repeat } from 'lit-html/directives/repeat.js';
import { ifDefined } from 'lit-html/directives/if-defined.js';
const getId = ({ id }) => id;
const stooges = [
{ id: 1, name: 'Larry', img: 'images/larry.jpg' },
{ id: 2, name: 'Curly' },
{ id: 3, name: 'Moe', img: 'image/moe.jpg' }
];
const stoogeTpl = ({ id, name, img }) => html`
<li data-stooge="${id}">
<img src="${ifDefined(img)}"/>
</li>`;
const stoogesTpl = html`<ul>${repeat(stooges, getId, stoogeTpl)}</ul>`;
The repeat
directive is used like Array#map
to generate a list of templates
from an Array. As of this writing it appears that for most use cases
Array#map
is just as if not more performant than repeat
. But for cases
where you will be changing the order of a large list of items that have their
own IDs, repeat
is where it's at.
ifDefined
is used to check if a value is defined before outputting the
associated DOM. It's useful when you only want to apply an attribute in the
case that your value exists, like we've done with <img src>
above.
The until
directive can be used to wait on a promise, showing some default
content in the mean time.
html`<h1>${until({
this.userPromise.then(user => user.name),
'Loading User...'
})}</h1>`;
The when
directive functions just like the ternary (x ? y : z
) expression,
but it's lazy. You pass an expression, and two functions that return
TemplateResult
s for the truthy and falsy cases of some expression, they will
only be evaluated as needed.
const postTpl = ({ title, summary }) => html`
<dt>${title}</dt>
<dd>${summary}</dd>`
const userPostsTpl = ({ name, posts = [] }) => html`
<h1>${name}'s Posts</h1>
<dl>${posts.map(postTpl)}</dl>`
const loggedOutTpl = () => html`
<h1>Log in to see your posts</h1>
<mwc-button @click="${login}">Login</mwc-button>`
const userPageTpl = (user = { loggedIn: false }) => html`
<header>
${when(user.loggedIn, () => userPostsTpl(user), loggedOutTpl)}
</header>`;
The guard
directive prevents a re-render until an expression's identity
changes (meaning, if you change the expression from one primitive to another or
from one object reference to another, even if the object's contents are
equivalent)
The classMap
and styleMap
directives help you set classes and styles on
your components in a more efficient manner
// Because of lit-html internals, this is inefficient.
const userTpl = ({ token, name }) =>
html`<div class="user ${ token ? 'loggedIn' : '' }">${name}</div>`;
// Using `classMap` instead keeps your templates efficient.
const userTpl = ({ token, name }) =>
html`<div class="${classMap({ loggedIn: token, user: true })}">${name}</div>`;
The directives APIs are some of the last to be finalized before ye olde big 1.0 launch, so stay up to date by checking the README and the documentation
LitElement
You can and should use lit-html
on its own in your projects. But we're here
to talk web components. It just so happens to be that the LitElement
base
class is the official custom element class for working with lit-html
.
If lit-html
is about computing UI with pure functions, then LitElement
is
about hitching that mechanism to a very object-oriented customElement
class.
When you extend from it and provide a render()
method that returns a
TemplateResult
, LitElement
takes care of batching DOM updates for you.
import { LitElement, html } from 'lit-element';
const superlativeTpl = superlative =>
html`<li>So <em>${superlative}</em>!!</li>`
class SoLit extends LitElement {
static get properties() {
return {
title: { type: String },
superlatives: { type: {
fromAttribute: attr => attr.split(','),
toAttribute: xs => xs.join(),
} },
}
}
render() {
return html`
<h1>${this.title}</h1>
<p>Proof:</p>
<ul>${this.superlatives.map(superlativeTpl)}</ul>
`;
}
}
With this brief introduction to the new hotness that lit-html
and
LitElement
bring, we're ready to start our refactor of <lazy-image>
.
<lit-lazy-image>
Just like last week, our first step will be to import our dependencies and rename the component.
import { LitElement, html } from 'lit-element';
const isIntersecting = ({isIntersecting}) => isIntersecting;
const tagName = 'lit-lazy-image';
class LitLazyImage extends LitElement {/*..*/}
customElements.define(tagName, LitLazyImage);
Next we'll define our render method, using <polymer-lazy-image>
's as a
template (pun!), but replacing the static binding expression strings with JS expressions, and adjusting the binding syntax. All
of the styles will stay the same as the ones we used for
<polymer-lazy-image>
.
render() {
return html`
<style>/*...*/</style>
<div id="placeholder" aria-hidden="${String(!!this.intersecting)}">
<slot name="placeholder"></slot>
</div>
<img id="image"
aria-hidden="${String(!this.intersecting)}"
.src="${this.intersecting ? this.src : undefined}"
alt="${this.alt}"
@load="${this.onLoad}"
/>
`;
}
Since we can interpolate actual JavaScript expressions, we don't need any of the computed binding methods from our polymer-based implementation. We likewise don't need the property getters and setters from the vanilla version, since LitElement has its own mechanism for managing properties and attributes. We'll discuss LitElement's properties system in more depth later on.. For now, it's enough to define our observed attributes in a static getter:
static get properties() {
return {
alt: { type: String },
intersecting: { type: Boolean },
src: { type: String },
loaded: {
type: Boolean,
reflect: true,
},
}
}
And really, that's basically it. One small change I made was to explicitly fire
a loaded-changed
event when the image loads up, to maintain compatibility
with Polymer-style templating systems:
onLoad(event) {
this.loaded = true;
// Dispatch an event that supports Polymer two-way binding.
this.dispatchEvent(
new CustomEvent('loaded-changed', {
bubbles: true,
composed: true,
detail: {
value: true,
},
})
);
}
And I took the opportunity to refactor initIntersectionObserver
to handle its
own feature detection:
initIntersectionObserver() {
// if IntersectionObserver is unavailable,
// simply load the image.
if (!('IntersectionObserver' in window)) {
return this.intersecting = true;
}
// ...
}
But the truth is that thanks to lit-html
, we've deleted a lot more than we've
added here.
Here's our completed component, Check out the
diff, down to 140 LOC from <polymer-lazy-image>
's 160 and
<lazy-image>
's 195:
import { LitElement, html } from 'lit-element';
const isIntersecting = ({isIntersecting}) => isIntersecting;
const tagName = 'lit-lazy-image';
class LitLazyImage extends LitElement {
render() {
return html`
<style>
:host {
position: relative;
}
#image,
#placeholder ::slotted(*) {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
transition:
opacity
var(--lazy-image-fade-duration, 0.3s)
var(--lazy-image-fade-easing, ease);
object-fit: var(--lazy-image-fit, contain);
width: var(--lazy-image-width, 100%);
height: var(--lazy-image-height, 100%);
}
#placeholder ::slotted(*),
:host([loaded]) #image {
opacity: 1;
}
#image,
:host([loaded]) #placeholder ::slotted(*) {
opacity: 0;
}
</style>
<div id="placeholder" aria-hidden="${String(!!this.intersecting)}">
<slot name="placeholder"></slot>
</div>
<img id="image"
aria-hidden="${String(!this.intersecting)}"
.src="${this.intersecting ? this.src : undefined}"
alt="${this.alt}"
@load="${this.onLoad}"
/>
`;
}
static get properties() {
return {
/**
* Image alt-text.
* @type {String}
*/
alt: { type: String },
/**
* Whether the element is on screen.
* @type {Boolean}
*/
intersecting: { type: Boolean },
/**
* Image URI.
* @type {String}
*/
src: { type: String },
/**
* Whether the image has loaded.
* @type {Boolean}
*/
loaded: {
type: Boolean,
reflect: true,
},
}
}
constructor() {
super();
this.observerCallback = this.observerCallback.bind(this);
this.intersecting = false;
this.loading = false;
}
connectedCallback() {
super.connectedCallback();
// Remove the wrapping `<lazy-image>` element from the a11y tree.
this.setAttribute('role', 'presentation');
// if IntersectionObserver is available, initialize it.
this.initIntersectionObserver();
}
disconnectedCallback() {
super.disconnectedCallback();
this.disconnectObserver();
}
/**
* Sets the `intersecting` property when the element is on screen.
* @param {[IntersectionObserverEntry]} entries
* @protected
*/
observerCallback(entries) {
if (entries.some(isIntersecting)) this.intersecting = true;
}
/**
* Sets the `loaded` property when the image is finished loading.
* @protected
*/
onLoad(event) {
this.loaded = true;
// Dispatch an event that supports Polymer two-way binding.
const bubbles = true;
const composed = true;
const detail = { value: true };
this.dispatchEvent(new CustomEvent('loaded-changed', { bubbles, composed, detail }));
}
/**
* Initializes the IntersectionObserver when the element instantiates.
* @protected
*/
initIntersectionObserver() {
// if IntersectionObserver is unavailable, simply load the image.
if (!('IntersectionObserver' in window)) return this.intersecting = true;
// Short-circuit if observer has already initialized.
if (this.observer) return;
// Start loading the image 10px before it appears on screen
const rootMargin = '10px';
this.observer = new IntersectionObserver(this.observerCallback, { rootMargin });
this.observer.observe(this);
}
/**
* Disconnects and unloads the IntersectionObserver.
* @protected
*/
disconnectObserver() {
this.observer.disconnect();
this.observer = null;
delete this.observer;
}
}
customElements.define(tagName, LitLazyImage);
There's much more to learn about LitElement
than our simple lazy-loading
example demonstrates. Let's dive in to the API and see what we can see.
Attributes and Properties
LitElement
comes with the ability to define property and attribute
descriptors. These are similar to the ones we used with PolymerElement
last
week, but LitElement
's are at once more powerful and more flexible.
Any property defined in the static properties
getter will be added to the
list of observedAttributes
(for more on that, see our piece on vanilla web
components).
For simple cases, you can just pass the type constructor of the property.
/**
* When the `simple` attribute is set,
* it will also set the `simple` property
*/
simple: { type: String },
Reflecting Properties to Attributes
If you'd like to reflect changes to the property as an attribute, flag the
reflect
boolean in the property descriptor.
/**
* Just like `simple`, but it will also set the `reflecting`
* attribute when the `reflecting` property is set.
*/
reflecting: {
type: Number, // defaults to `String`
reflect: true,
},
You can also set the attribute
descriptor to specify which attribute to
synchronize with.
/**
* Like `string` and `reflect`, but this time syncs to the
* `special-attribute` attribute. If `attribute` is not specified,
* it will sync with the lowercase property name
* i.e. `definedattr`
*/
definedAttr: {
type: String,
attribute: 'special-attribute', // defaults to `true`
reflect: true,
},
The attribute
descriptor can be either false
, in which case the attribute
won't be observed (but setting the DOM property will still run LitElement
effects); true
, in which case the ascii lowercased property name will be
observed; or a string, in which case that specific string will be observed for
that property.
Controlling Serialization
Serialization means converting data like numbers, arrays, or objects, to a format that can reliably be sent one piece at a time, like a string. It happens to be that all HTML attribute values are strings, so when we talk about serialization w.r.t. DOM properties, we're talking stringification.
If you want to control how that process works in your element, you can specify
in the type
descriptor a function to handle serialization (defaults to the
String
constructor). For fine-grained control over the process, set type
to
an object with functions at the properties fromAttribute
and toAttribute
.
<super-serializer serialized="a|b|c|d"></super-serializer>
<script type="module">
import { LitElement } from 'lit-element';
class extends LitElement {
static get properties() {
return {
serialized: {
type: {
fromAttribute: x => x.split('|')
toAttribute: xs => xs.join('|')
}
}
}
}
};
customElements.define('super-serializer', SuperSerializer);
const el = document.querySelector('super-serializer');
(async () => {
console.log(el.serialized); // ["a", "b", "c", "d"]
el.serialized = [1, 2, 3, 4];
await el.updateComplete;
console.log(el.serialized); // [1, 2, 3, 4]
console.log(el.getAttribute('serialized')) // "1|2|3|4"
})();
</script>
Determining when a Property Has Changed
You can control how your element will react to property changes by setting the
hasChanged
property of a property descriptor to a predicate function
(meaning, a function that returns a Boolean). This will be pretty useful when
your property is a reference type like Object
or Array
.
The signature of the hasChanged
function is (newVal, oldVal) -> Boolean
, so
you could do something like:
const userType = {
fromAttribute: id => getUserSync(users, id),
toAttribute: ({ id }) => id,
};
const userHasChanged = (
{ id, avatar, name } = {},
{ id: oldId, avatar: oldAvatar, name: oldName } = {}
) => (
id !== oldId ||
avatar !== oldAvatar ||
name !== oldName
);
static get properties() {
return {
user: {
type: userType,
hasChanged: userHasChanged,
}
}
}
You'd use hasChanged
for fine-grained control over the element's lifecycle on
a per-property basis. There are also a number of methods that you can implement
in your element to affect how the lifecycle turns.
LitElement
Lifecycle
In addition to the standard custom element lifecycle
callbacks,
LitElement
provides a number of specific methods which help you control how
and when your element renders.
shouldUpdate
To control whether or not your element re-renders, implement the shouldUpdate
function which takes a Map
of changed properties, which refers to the old
values.
shouldUpdate(changedProperties) {
return !changedProperties.has('dataOnlyProp') || changed;
}
By default, shouldUpdate
returns true
.
update
We've already seen the render
method, which determines the element's
template. render
is called by the update
method, which, like
shouldUpdate
, takes a Map
of changed properties. You might use update
to
perform side-effects not related to the DOM. Don't manipulate properties here,
since setting them won't trigger another update.
update(changedProperties) {
// Don't forget this or your element won't render!
super.update(changedProperties);
if (changedProperties.get('loggedIn') && !this.loginReported) {
Analytics.report('Logged In', this.user.id)
this.loginReported = true;
}
}
firstUpdated
and updated
But if you want to perform side effects related to the DOM, like getting a
reference to a shadow-child or setting a light-child attribute, you should use
either firstUpdated
or updated
:
/**
* firstUpdated runs once after the element renders for
* the first time. It's ideal for capturing references to
* shadow children, etc.
* @param {Map<string, any>} changedProperties
*/
firstUpdated(changedProperties) {
// Capture references to shadow children.
this.player = this.shadowRoot.querySelector('video');
// Setting observed properties here will trigger an update.
this.loaded = true;
}
/**
* Updated runs every time the element renders, so it's well-
* suited for managing light DOM children, or anything else that you
* don't directly control in your template.
* @param {Map<string, any>} changedProperties
*/
updated(changedProperties) {
this.children.forEach(child => setAttribute('updated', new Date()))
super.updated(changedProperties);
}
Setting observed properties in either firstUpdated
or updated
will trigger
a re-render.
requestUpdate
The requestUpdate
method which will explicitly cause the element to update
and re-render. You can call this method in one of two ways. Calling without
arguments will simply re-render the element. This is useful when for example
you want to set some element state based on something other than properties,
like light DOM children.
// Get a DOM reference to your element
const myLitEl = document.querySelector('my-lit-element');
// When the element's light DOM mutates, call `requestUpdate`
const onMutation = ([{target}]) => target.requestUpdate();
const observer = new MutationObserver(onMutation);
observer.observe(myLitEl, {
attributes: false,
childList: true,
subtree: true,
});
When you call requestUpdate
with a specific property and value, LitElement
will run the side effects configured for that property, for example reflecting
its attribute. You should do this if you've implemented setters for your
properties.
set customProp(value) {
// Do your thing, we try not to judge - honest!
weirdSideEffect(value);
// Make sure LitElement has its house in order.
this.requestUpdate('customProp', this.customProp)
}
updateComplete
The updateComplete
property (NOTE: Not a method!!) is a promise that
resolves when rendering is finished. You'll notice we've used it in some of our
earlier examples. Wait for this promise when you want to access the updated
DOM.
class MouseMachine extends LitElement {
static get properties() {
return {
meaning: {
type: String,
attribute: 'life-the-universe-and-everything',
},
};
}
};
customElements.define('mouse-machine', MouseMachine);
const mm = document.createElement('mouse-machine');
document.body.append(mm);
(async () => {
mm.meaning = 42;
await mm.updateComplete;
console.log(myLitEl.getAttribute('life-the-universe-and-everything'));
});
Factoring Apps with LitElement
Unlike Polymer elements, with their two-way-binding templates, lit elements are
particularly well suited to the types of one-way data flows popularized by the
React/Redux pattern and others. You can create or import class mixins which
connect your elements to your central store and update their props. In fact,
I've released a set of base classes which extend from LitElement
that connect
your components to an Apollo GraphQL client cache. Check it out:
The PWA Starter Kit is a fully-realised example of an app factored with
LitElement
and Redux
.
But since lit-elements are just DOM, you can set their properties with vanilla JavaScript, which means that you can use any state management solution that speaks JavaScript, pre-made or bespoke.
A future post will go more into detail about options for factoring web-component-based apps, so stay tuned!
Conclusions
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Functional UI with lit-html and LitElement | Coming from Polymer's two-way binding, it's a change in paradigm. |
Based in web standards, no need for babel, typescript, or long toolchains. | The one non-standard usage is bare specifiers, requiring either a bundler or a server-side transform. |
Aligns well with patterns and syntax familiar to many popular libraries | Although the community is vocal and growing, it's not yet as large and popular as other libraries (at least, not until you get involved, dear reader) |
LitElement
is set to be the go-to custom element base class for most
projects, but it's far from the only game in town. Join us next week to look at
Gluon, a slimmed-down and simple custom elements framework that gives you key
features without the bloat.
See you then 😊
Would you like a one-on-one mentoring session on any of the topics covered here?
Acknowledgements
Thanks again are due to @ruphin for sharing his
insights into lit-html
and the web components standards, and to Amit Merin
and morbidick in the Polymer community slack for their proofreading.
Errata
- Since this post was originally published, lit-html 1.0 and lit-element 2.0 stable were released. The pros/cons table has been updated to reflect that.
Check out the next article in the series on Gluon